About Me

Name: john prange
Email: jpscoins@mei.net Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Roll

 

Clamor growing for McCain handlers to free Sarah

You heard it here first. After watching her performance the day after the convention, I warned the McCain braintrust to let Sarah be Sarah or they would extinguish the fire we all felt after watching her acceptance speech.  It looks like they have her now in a straightjacket, fearful of saying something not scripted for her.  I know Sarah is not scared of the likes of Katie Couric or that buffoon from ABC whose name I have already forgotten. But she looks scared nonetheless because she is afraid of offending McCain's moderate script writers. They are turning America's latest folk hero into a fading shadow of her former self.
 
The last thing America wants is another candidate polished in Washingtonspeak. They want someone fresh and not afraid to speak her mind.  Apparently she is too conservative for the milquetoasts who coached McCain into near silence on the big bailout issue when it came up in the debate. McCain could have scored a knockout if he had only spoken up strongly in favor of taxpayers like Senators Shelby and Bunning did. Now McCain is in danger of losing conservatives like me who were going to vote for a third party candidate until Palin came along.
 
It would be better if Sarah's true conservatism rubbed off on McCain rather than his fence-sitting personality rub off on her.  Apparently she is too much of a maverick for the McCain camp.  Of course she can't be directly contradicting McCain on the campaign trail, but let her speak her mind and use her own words.  We want to hear what the Governor of Alaska has to say not what a bunch of political hack insiders have scripted for her.
 
If the real Sarah Palin reemerges in Thursday's debate, McCain will regain momentum and achieve a stirring victory.  If the scared puppet shows up, Heaven help us all.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Hillary and Sarah: God fearing, gun-toting, gutsy women

Seems this is the year of the God-fearing, gun-toting, gutsy woman (GFGTGW). First we had Hillary on the campaign trail conveying that image, more or less depending on whose votes she was trying to win at the time. Then, after Obama snubbed her when picking his sidekick, McCain picked the Mother of all GFGTGW, Sarah Palin, as his running mate.

Respectfully, Sarah gave Hillary credit for all those cracks she put in the "glass ceiling" (while aiming at ducks?). While the two have much in common, there are some notable differences. For example, I can't picture Sarah posing in front of the cameras in a tavern drinking whiskey with beer chasers, as Hillary did, in an effort to get the barfly vote. While Hillary perhaps gained a few extra votes and gave a boost to the alcohol and pub industries, Sarah would likely be more conscious of the example she would be setting for young people.

Of course the big issue that divides Sarah and Hillary is abortion. Sarah is pro-life, which is why she has been attacked by shrieking, antiquated feminists such as Gloria Steinem. If only Sarah supported the right to kill unborn babies with impunity, they wouldn't care who or why or how many government employees she fired in Alaska; furthermore, they wouldn't care if she chopped off their heads and danced on their graves wearing the skins of slain Polar Bears. For many, but not all, Hillary supporters, abortion trumps every other issue. That's why Hillary's husband got a pass on sexual harassment; he was willing to do whatever the abortophiles told him to do, even vetoing a bipartisan bill that would have banned partial birth abortions.

Because Sarah is a genuine God-fearing, gun-toting, gutsy woman, even when not running for office, the hardcore Left hates her. But for the rest of us, she is a refreshing alternative to politics as usual. For example, she exposed members of her own party for having too-cozy relationships with the oil industry they were supposed to be monitoring. That's one of the reasons she has over an 80 percent approval rating among all voters in Alaska even while some elitists in her own party disapprove of her. She put the interests of the people she was elected to represent over the interests of the entrenched powercrats. That's the type of represenation we need in Washington.

So, while I cannot visualize her accepting a campaign contribution from Planned Parenthood, or bellying up to the bar for a photo-op, I can picture Mrs. Palin barging in on a secret meeting between Chris Dodd, Barack Obama, and some of their crony contributors in the banking industry, and sternly yanking each senator by an ear -- "Oh no you don't, not on my watch!"

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

In fact, there is a clear link between Iraq and 9-11

Ironically, the most irrefutable link between 9-11 and Iraq was established by a federal judge who was appointed by President Clinton. In 2003, U.S. District Judge Harold Baer ruled that Iraq "provided material support" to Osama bin Laden and al-Quaeda. The ruling came in a lawsuit filed by the families of two men who died in the World Trade Center terrorist attack.
 
So score another one for Sarah. Furthermore, so what if Bush has backed away from earlier assertions that Iraq was linked to 9-11?  This just disproves the Left's claim that Palin is merely a puppet of the Bush administration. She has a brain of her own, and we need it in Washington.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Glad Dems took lipstick bait, BUT . . .

Wednesday, September 10, 2008
 
It is fun watching the Dems get hoisted on their own politically correct petard with the "lipstick on a pig" line -- and it should be noted that Obama's offensive remark was not only sexist but also homosexist as only females and gay men are apt to wear lipstick. But now that Palin and McCain have raised the rhetorical standard for this campaign, they must be especially careful with their own language.
 
For example, pray that we never here Palin say, "When I was in Alaska, I was not afraid to call a spade a spade" or McCain say something like, "When it comes to spending the people's money, I am more niggardly than my opponent."
 
Meantime, let's enjoy the moment, and give Sarah the Huntress credit for setting the lipstick trap. That's why I say, let Sarah be Sarah. But Sarah, be careful. 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

To the McCain Brain Trust: Don't Micromanage Sarah

If Sarah Palin had performed at the Convention the way she performed in Cedarville, Wisconsin the next day, she would either be off the ticket or Obama, instead of preparing his next stump speech, would be rehearsing for his swearing-in ceremony. The contrast between St. Paul Sarah and Cedarville Sarah was scary. It was as though Sarah had been scolded  for ad-libbing too much during her dazzling Wednesday night performance. On Thursday she seemed like she was afraid to take her finger off the lines she was READING, the same lines she had delivered the night before as though they were her own or had been memorized.
 
Perhaps campaign managers are afraid that Sarah will make McCain look pale by comparison. Or maybe they just don't have the confidence in her that most of us fans do.  But if they turn confident Sarah into puppet Sarah, they will be turning the enthusiasm Sarah ignited at the convention into ashes.
 
Let Sarah be Sarah.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »